This design is ugly as ever! Seriously looks like you're wearing white boats on your feet with how high the soles are. Terrible changes in the design as my feet are hurting each time I have used them. Saucony go back to the design of Triumph 21!

I LOVED the Speed 2s and have been hoping Saucony will get back to more of the responsive feel of that shoe. These are just too much on the feet. They run a bit bigger than the previous Speed models and there is way too much going on in the heel. Please bring back the same feel as the 2s!!!! Need a great balance between cushion and pop and these are just too much cushion. Please stop changing the models so drastically!

I ran in Sauconys for years, and I am so disappointed in the past few Ride models, and the Ride 17 especially. After barely 100 miles of road running, the sole on my pair is drastically worn with the tread grooves not even visible in some places. I am a true neutral runner with good biomechanics, so this is especially disappointing. I still have a pair of my Ride 6s that I keep around for mowing the lawn and stuff, and even though they're over a decade old and have close to 4K miles on them now, the soles are still in way better shape than my practically new Ride 17's soles. The new Saucony models feel and perform more like shoes for people who want to LOOK like they run, not for people who actually run. They're more of an athlete shoe than a modern, technical, fully functional running shoe.

These shoes are just what I needed as a 55 year old who loves to exercise/walk at a fast pace. On various occasions, I've experienced ankle, knee or hip pain from walking like I do. I don't want to give up being outside and walking, so I recently searched for the perfect shoe and found these. At first, it felt differently. It was like walking on a mattress when I wore them around the house just trying them on. But then, I hit the pavement and absolutely fell in love. I bought the pale blue color; it's a perfect color. I'm not a fan of white, black, or those loud colored shoes other brands have. Thank you for designing a shoe that has motivated me to keep up my pace and schedule without fear of aches and pain afterward.

I loved the Endorphin Speed 3! I still have my pair from last year - even though they're wearing out. I bought the Speed 4s ... and sent them back! What happened? I loved how springy yet cushioned the Speed 3s felt. These have no cushion. I felt everything on the road. And they gave my legs no energy.

Terrible fit. I've trained in Triumphs forever & before the Endorphins, ran marathons in them too. I loved this shoe but this redesign is awful. Shoe is too wide in the midfoot, doesn't sit well in the arch & I can't even tie the laces tight enough to get good support. This shoe fits like the Ride (which I tried & disliked) but has a lot more cushion. Also, the toe box is too generous, I have blisters from my foot sloshing around. It pains me to write this review. I bought every pair of 21's I could find & finally had to get the 22's. Will be looking for another shoe.

I absolutely LOVED the Triumph 20s and 21s, but these fit completely differently! The forefoot is so much wider and the cushioning is clunky. The shoes were way too wide, so I had to return them. PLEASE bring back the style of the 21s!! They WERE my favorite running shoes.

I have used Triumph shoes since 2020 and loved the 19, 20, and 21. However, I feel like the ball was dropped on this one. The foam feels hard, like there is no give. Despite using previous versions to run anywhere between 3 and 26 miles, these felt like rocks after a single mile. The pwrrun+ was much better than the PB. They also feel clunky, almost like a certain other brand that makes overly large, unsupportive shoes. I get that they wanted to change this, but they ruined a tried and true and well-loved, reliable shoe with this update. I ended up giving mine away after only putting 75 miles on them because my legs and feet hurt so badly with these. I just ordered an old version. If you liked the old Triumphs, I would not suggest these.

I've worn Saucony walking shoes for years after a podiatrist recommendation when I broke my foot (I also have chronic pain from lupus and being terribly overweight). Wanting something lighter and less "old lady" looking, I blind-bought the Triumph 22 after researching reviews for almost a year and even asking AI for comparisons. I am so glad I took the plunge!

Let me preface this review: I do not/cannot run?these are for walking and standing only. They are super comfortable right out of the box, they're both springy and cushiony, eliminating the need for inserts, they don't shove my feet forward, and they are keeping me from underpronating (supinating?). They also support my arches, having a roomy toe box, and my heels aren't hurting. They do all of this perfectly and look far more stylish than traditional walking shoes.

I tried Brooks Ghost a few years ago because I didn't have a store near me that carried Saucony's, but I had to buy inserts and they also felt like they didn't "lock and load" my heels or ankles properly. Suffice it to say, I will never buy another brand of running/walking shoe.

Now if only Saucony would make tennis shoe heels?

I've been an avid Triumph runner since the 18's and run about 20-30miles a week. This 22 is a completely different shoe and so disappointing with 60miles in so far. The toe box is super wide so I get blisters and I never ever get blisters. The shoe feels too chunky and clunky. It's heavier than the previous versions. I've had all sorts of random foot pains. PLEASE bring back the old style and make this a Max version or something else. I will have to find a new shoe now. Very sad, this used to the best all around shoe ever. ??